Dropping into the news scene as I tend to do often these days due to the utter lack of anything else to do but wander..
I just want to give a big round of applause to Judge Carmen Beauchamp Cipatrick and the state of New York for their astounding loophole for kiddie porn in their state. Now, I have heard of a lot of absurd laws still intact from the good ole days but never did I realize that viewing kiddie porn was just as legal as walking down the street and grabbing a pack of smokes. According to this Judge, though, that's exactly what it is. There is only one catch to not getting caught red handed. (Literally.) You just can't download these videos or images to your computer. What about the Cache? Doesn't matter! Even if you are shown to be a repeat visitor to these sites, you are scott free provided they don't see your stash of little boys in your basement. (But you got that duct tape right? You should be just fine.)
Defendant Court Case. (The people vs James D. Kent)
Apparently, all you gotta do is claim that you didn't know.
Kiddie Porn NY (Original Article)
If that alone doesn't get to you out there.. Try THIS one on for size. Last season, a senator in OK, wanted to amend a bill that is just fresh off the press. The "Personhood Bill". Yes, everyone shudder together and women burn your bras. Not yet though. The Senator wanted to push it further in the attempt to make sure that ALL the semen in the world would have a "chance to do their job". The amendment would make several things illegal. Masturbation amongst one of them stating that "semen not be deposited in anything other than a woman's vagina". Of course, with an extreme swing to the right there will always be an extreme left. Wanna know what the lefties are up to?
POST birth abortions. Oh yeah, that crying and breathing newborn? Go ahead and kill it. ESPECIALLY if it has some birth disease. Australians Alberto and Francesca lay claim that they didn't want to make it legal (though, this came out AFTER the death threats) but their list of reasoning behind the action of the Post birth abortion seems like a pretty good layout for the fight to make it a bill. Beyond the eugenics underlying in this idea, they state that because the newborn is "still developing" it doesn't have a normal right to live.
Does that mean I can outright kill my teenager too? They're still maturing and developing and, these days, they don't contribute shit to the community. The whine generation as I like to see them.
They also explain that if it is a financial burden to the family, it is indeed better off for them to just get rid of the child. Don't we have something for this though? Oh, right.. adoption. According to the pair, the psychological damages of adoption FAR outweigh those of the damages that it could do to ones psyche knowing that you just killed a perfectly innocent and healthy human being.
They say that this wasn't meant to be read by the general populace (you know, that giant crowd of people that would probably denounce their citizenship to any country that would allow this to happen or the other giant crowd that would probably carry out their Second Amendment in America if you dared trying it). It was meant to be read by other bioethicists.
Don't mind me.. I'm just going to go create a child so I can go through 9 months of pregnancy, labor for 12 hours and pop one out that I can literally pop.
Article 1
Our apologies, this wasn't meant the way you think it was.
And just to be a dick about it.. turns out their "colleagues" didn't take so well to the issue at hand either..
Ezio
Michele
Andrew McGee
Charles
Interesting to check out if you have time. Good news though, I think I've found quite an interesting site to pass the time..
No comments:
Post a Comment